Table of Contents
RegenCHOICE criteria
Pro-activity (criterion)
Question structure: AORBQ or OPTSQ
Roberto wanted a scale for assessing how much people are self-motivated, self-starting, etc. On one extreme, people just think they know what to do and go ahead without checking; and at the other end they want to be told exactly what to do and never take any initiative.
Options
ChatGPT version
(as an optsq)
- Extreme Self-Direction:
“I confidently identify tasks or projects on my own and actively pursue them without needing input or approval from others, trusting my judgment and expertise.” - High Self-Direction with Some Check-ins:
“While I usually take the initiative and start projects independently, I occasionally seek feedback or confirmation to ensure alignment with broader goals and expectations.” - Balanced Self-Direction and Guidance Seeking:
“I balance self-motivation with collaborative input, often initiating projects but regularly consulting with others to gather diverse perspectives and ensure alignment with team objectives.” - Moderate Preference for Direction:
“I appreciate having clear guidelines and tend to wait for instructions or explicit approval before taking on new tasks, though I'm willing to make small decisions independently.” - Strong Preference for Explicit Instructions:
“I perform best when provided with specific directions and detailed instructions, preferring not to take initiatives unless explicitly requested or directed to do so.”
This scale provides a nuanced view of an individual's approach towards self-motivation and initiative. The statements are designed to be entirely positive, reflecting that each approach has its place and value depending on the context and requirements of a project or role. Participants can choose the statement that best aligns with their natural inclination or approach in a work or community setting. This assessment can help match individuals with roles or environments that suit their working style.
Edited version
(to be completed)
