2024-08-03
I've now gone through two major milestones of later life, this year.
I retired from partnership at
Cetis LLP, and with that, my last paid work; and at the same time, I've started drawing a state pension.
After nearly 43 years since my oldest child was born, the youngest of my children has reached legal adulthood, as of a few days ago. No legal dependents any more!
And I've been thinking about this title theme for some time now.
I'm taking this title – “non-possessive collaboration” – both because it captures for me the essence of one of the new paradigms that has not been expressed well, and because that exact phrase appears not to have been publicly used, at least as I write this it turns up no results with a search on Google. And as an extra, non-possessive collaboration can be abbreviated NPC, which is a nice play on NVC as in Nonviolent Communication.
My intention is to write a series of pieces here. I intend to explore:
any history and background I can find
for example, the quote attributed to
Aneurin Bevan, “The purpose of getting power is to be able to give it away.”
related terms like collaborative filtering and collaborative signposting
some references to the history of possession in the sense of property
a simple explanation of old-paradigm competitive marketing
examples of how this aspect is missing from a lot of new paradigm actions, and even thinking
how non-possessive collaboration might work…
in membership organisations
with internet platforms
for web sites more generally
in intentional living and learning communities
with investment and funding
in parenthood and family life
-
Please get in touch if you might want to contribute to anything here.
So, as a starting point for where other people might be around this idea, I tried the idea out with claude.ai, with the query “what could “non-possessive collaboration” mean, and how would that relate to other current ideas?”. Here is the response:
“Non-possessive collaboration” is an intriguing concept. While not a widely established term, we can interpret its meaning and explore how it might relate to current ideas in collaboration and knowledge sharing. Here's an analysis:
Potential meaning of “non-possessive collaboration”:
Open sharing: Participants freely share ideas without claiming exclusive ownership.
Collective ownership: The group owns the outcomes, rather than individuals.
Focus on common good: Prioritizing collective benefits over personal gain.
Ego-less contribution: Valuing ideas based on merit, not their source.
Fluid participation: People can join or leave without disrupting the collaboration.
Related current ideas:
Open-source movement:
Creative Commons licensing:
Peer production:
Collaborative creation of content or products without traditional hierarchical organization.
Examples: Wikipedia, citizen science projects.
Commons-based peer production:
Gift economy in digital spaces:
Sharing information or skills without expectation of direct compensation.
Seen in online communities, forums, and some social media platforms.
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs):
Co-creation in business:
Open innovation:
Collective intelligence:
Commons-based economy:
Economic systems based on shared resources and collective management.
Extends non-possessive collaboration to broader economic structures.
“Non-possessive collaboration” seems to emphasize a shift away from individual ownership and credit in collaborative efforts, focusing instead on collective benefits and open sharing. This aligns with many emerging ideas in digital collaboration, knowledge commons, and alternative economic models.